Training Your FiveM Staff Team on Refund Procedures
Consistent decisions come from consistent training
Untrained staff create inconsistent experiences. One moderator approves a request, another denies the same type. Players notice, complain, and lose trust. Proper training ensures every staff member makes decisions the same way.
Week 1: Shadowing and observation
New staff should observe before acting. Have them shadow experienced moderators for at least 20 refund decisions. They should understand the full workflow before touching any commands.
- Day 1-2: Read all documentation, policies, and past announcements
- Day 3-4: Shadow live refund processing, ask questions after each case
- Day 5-7: Practice with test cases in a staging environment
The decision framework
Give staff a simple flowchart for decisions. Complex judgment calls should escalate, but 80% of cases should follow the framework exactly. This removes guesswork and ensures consistency.
Decision Flowchart
1. Does evidence exist? No → Request evidence. 2. Does evidence show server fault? No → Deny with policy reference. 3. Is value under $10k? Yes → Approve. No → Escalate to senior staff. 4. Is player in good standing? No → Flag for review.
Common mistakes new staff make
Learn from others' errors. These are the most frequent mistakes we see from new refund staff across hundreds of servers.
- Approving without checking logs (trust but verify)
- Being too lenient to avoid conflict (consistency matters more)
- Not documenting denial reasons (future staff need context)
- Taking player frustration personally (stay professional)
- Skipping the queue order (fairness builds trust)
Escalation procedures
Not every decision should be made alone. Define clear escalation triggers: high-value refunds, repeat requesters, staff misconduct claims, and anything the moderator isn't confident about.
- Tag the senior staff role in the ticket with a summary
- Do not promise outcomes to the player
- Document your assessment even if escalating
- Follow up within 24 hours if no response
Ongoing training and feedback
Training doesn't end after onboarding. Schedule monthly reviews of difficult cases, update documentation when policies change, and give constructive feedback on decision quality.
“We review 10 random refund decisions each week as a team. Discussing edge cases together improved our consistency score from 72% to 94% in three months.”
Invest in training upfront and you'll spend less time fixing mistakes later. Consistent staff create consistent player experiences.
Need a smarter refund flow?
LD Refund System automates Discord approvals, in-game claims, and audit logging so your staff stay focused on players.